Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral Gleam dupes and alternatives Alleyoop
4.8 (1,101)·Fair · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$24Ulta Beauty(product price)$6 less (20%)3.9 (396)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol
$8.74$12.49Ulta Beauty$21.26 less (71%)4.1 (11,038)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: very fair with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
60
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (53%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
$13.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (53%)4.3 (33,167)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Full rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: natural beige shade with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light-medium coverage · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Retailer shade note: fair with warm-golden undertones
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
The closest shade to Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral Gleam (Fair · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Make Up For Ever HD Skin Matte Velvet Blurring Powder Foundation in 1N00 Alabaster, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in Gleam. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGleamClosest shade match1N00 AlabasterHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#f6ccb0#f5ccb0Looks identicalColour difference 0.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100FairFairSameDepth difference: 0.1
Retailer descriptionVery fairVery fairBoth described as very fairThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60Light-mediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared54
Longevity30%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, combination, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 72/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Ogee Complexion Perfecting Serum Foundation in Birch 0.25N, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in Gleam. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGleamClosest overall alternativeBirch 0.25NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#f6ccb0#f1caadLooks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.4
Retailer descriptionVery fairFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared82
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100Light-mediumMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall100
Skin type100%100SensitiveSensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 94/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $20 more
Walmart
