Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral Glisten dupes and alternatives Alleyoop
4.8 (1,101)·Medium light · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (47%)4.5 (1,466)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Full rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (47%)4.5 (1,466)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light-medium with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: for light skintones with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light - medium with neutral peach undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 36-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light-medium with neutral subtle golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Retailer shade note: light medium with warm undertones
Matches: Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral Glisten (Medium light · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
MAC Cosmetics Studio Fix Powder Plus Foundation in NW25, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in Glisten. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlistenClosest shade matchNW25How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%98#e2a483#e4a686Looks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60Light-mediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, combination, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 71/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Revolution Beauty Superdewy Cushion Foundation in Medium Tan Cool, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in Glisten. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGlistenClosest overall alternativeMedium Tan CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%88#e2a483#dba17bVery close colourColour difference 2.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100Light-mediumLightCloseLight coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 94/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $42 more
