Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral Halo dupes and alternatives Alleyoop
4.8 (1,101)·Tan · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium light-deep shade, rosy undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Light rather than light-medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Light rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
73
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: MD3 - Medium-deep with warm undertones, and a red tone
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (47%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (47%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (53%)3.9 (4,653)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium tan with cool undertone
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium - deep with warm deep golden undertones
$18.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.01 less (37%)4.1 (2,064)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims 48-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.01 less (60%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.01 less (60%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$18.01 less (60%)4.4 (182,841)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$20Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (33%)3.7 (146)
Matches: Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
49
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium deep with rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims 24-hour wear· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
The closest shade to Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral Halo (Tan · Cool undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Waterproof Foundation in 4C1 Praline, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in Halo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHaloClosest shade match4C1 PralineHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#bf7550#c7794fVery close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95TanTanSameDepth difference: 2.8
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100Light-mediumMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims colour stability (no oxidation); your product does not list it
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Saie Glowy Super Skin Tint Foundation in 24, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in Halo. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHaloClosest overall alternative24How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%85#bf7550#b66d4aVery close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%90TanTanSameDepth difference: 4.4
Retailer descriptionMediumMediumBoth described as mediumThe retailers describe the same depth
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared82
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100Light-mediumMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall70
Skin type100%70SensitiveNormal, dry, combination, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 88/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $25 more
Walmart
