Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral GoldenHour dupes and alternatives Alleyoop
4.8 (1,101)·Medium tan · Warm · peach undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium to deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same radiant finish
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (47%)4.5 (1,466)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
86
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Looks identical · Radiant · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Light rather than light-medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Light rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: tan with peachy neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims 12-hour wear
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish· Light rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than radiant finish · Light rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
55
Skin suitability
0
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertone
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (47%)4.3 (699)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · No SPF
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same radiant finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
73
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$14 less (47%)4.3 (2,230)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Full rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Light rather than light-medium coverage· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Light rather than light-medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
Retailer shade note: medium deep with rosy undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
68
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
48
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol · No SPF
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (neutral vs warm)· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light-medium coverage· Not marketed for sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light-medium coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · No SPF
Retailer shade note: Medium with neutral golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light-medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
60
Skin suitability
0
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light-medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Not marketed for sensitive skin · No SPF
The closest shade to Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral GoldenHour (Medium tan · Warm · peach undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Feather Matte Powder Foundation in 4W Crème Brûlée, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in GoldenHour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGoldenHourClosest shade match4W Crème BrûléeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%96#c47e5a#c77b56Looks identicalColour difference 1.3 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100Light-mediumBuildableCloseBuildable coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%40Not listed16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall68
Skin type100%68SensitiveCombination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 77/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Dior Backstage Glow-Up Skin Tint Hydrating Tinted Moisturizer SPF 20 in 6N, against Alleyoop Sunsational Daily Skin Tint SPF 50 Tinted Mineral in GoldenHour. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGoldenHourClosest overall alternative6NHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%91#c47e5a#c7845dVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared86
Finish35%100RadiantRadiantSameSame radiant finish
Coverage30%100Light-mediumMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than light-medium (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0SensitiveNormal, dry, oilyMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 83/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $25 more
