Lid Joy Matte Liquid Eyeshadow Harlem dupes and alternatives Ami Colé
4.1 (173)·Brown · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light-to-dark range of neutral mattes
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Taupe rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
33
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Mauve rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 36% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Nude rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Copper rather than brown· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Copper rather than brown · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
30
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Saie SuperSuede Baked Eyeshadow with 16hr Wear in Cannoli, against Ami Colé Lid Joy Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in Harlem. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeHarlemClosest matchCannoliHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#b97c64#bd7a5dVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 91/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.