Lid Joy Matte Liquid Eyeshadow Los Angeles dupes and alternatives Ami Colé
4.1 (173)·Blue · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Green rather than blue· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than blue · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Duochrome rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
16
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: sheer iridescent blue sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
26
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Purple rather than blue · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$1 less (13%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Purple rather than blue· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
4
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than blue · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: pale periwinkle w/blue, pink & silver pinpoints
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
19
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than blue · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
25
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Purple rather than blue· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Purple rather than blue · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
16
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than blue · Duochrome rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: electric purple teal with green blue shift
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
11
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Green rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
17
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Green rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
7
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than blue · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
28
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
14
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than blue · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
27
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: icy baby blue with silver and aqua sparkle
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Glitter rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
8
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Retailer shade note: Midnight blue metallic with indigo & baby blue shimmer/Smoky lilac with opal sparkle
Half Magic Sparklestik Eye Crayon in FROSTIWINKLE, against Ami Colé Lid Joy Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in Los Angeles. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLos AngelesClosest shade matchFROSTIWINKLEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall74
Colour60%88#a3b6e4#aebde5Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93LightLightSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 58/100Shade match 74/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Blueberry Bingsu, against Ami Colé Lid Joy Matte Liquid Eyeshadow in Los Angeles. Matched on pan 2. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLos AngelesClosest overall alternativeBlueberry BingsuHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%61#a3b6e4#8ea6c8Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%72LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 9.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared85
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Long-wearingNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 71/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $17 more
Sephora
Walmart
