Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
32
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$15.01 less (54%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
72
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
NARS Afterglow Lipstick in Ever After, against Anastasia Beverly Hills Lip Velvet Full-Pigment Lip Mousse in Softy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSoftyClosest matchEver AfterHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%83#eeaaa8#e0a0a1Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%86LightLightSameDepth difference 5.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · 1 of 2 compared65
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 2 compared40
Longevity60%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 77/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $22 more
