Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same format: liquid
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Peach rather than terracotta· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Peach rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Coral rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Coral rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Coral rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Coral rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Coral rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Coral rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Retailer shade note: warm coppery rose for medium-deep skin tones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than terracotta · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than terracotta· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than terracotta · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Apricot rather than terracotta· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Apricot rather than terracotta · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Coral rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Coral rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
Makeup By Mario Soft Pop Plumping Cream Blush Veil in Papaya Pop, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 42S Sunlit Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade42S Sunlit SiennaClosest shade matchPapaya PopHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall81
Colour55%86#eb734f#ec6644Very close colourColour difference 2.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 72/100Shade match 81/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Hourglass Unreal Liquid Blush in Moment, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 42S Sunlit Sienna. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade42S Sunlit SiennaClosest overall alternativeMomentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour55%79#eb734f#d77553Close colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 73/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$6 less (15%)
