Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: natural· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Pink rather than rose
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 63% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Pink rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Willa, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 62 Delicate Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade62 Delicate MauveClosest shade matchWillaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour55%92#d46e7b#d0757fVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Encourage, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 62 Delicate Mauve. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade62 Delicate MauveClosest overall alternativeEncourageHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour55%86#d46e7b#d27982Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 87/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $2 more
