Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Apricot rather than pink· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Apricot rather than pink · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Satin · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Claims waterproof
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Benefit Cosmetics Silky-Soft Powder Blush in Shellie, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 50.5 Rosy Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade50.5 Rosy PeachClosest shade matchShellieHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%98#f39384#f69483Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall75
Finish50%89NaturalSatinCloseSatin finish rather than natural
Format25%20LiquidPowderDifferentPowder rather than liquid
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity50%4012-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Bliss, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 50.5 Rosy Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade50.5 Rosy PeachClosest overall alternativeBlissHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour55%80#f39384#ea8d87Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall89
Finish50%78NaturalMatteCloseMatte finish rather than natural
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 90/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$15 less (38%)
