Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Brown / nude rather than rose· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 63% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Brown / nude rather than rose · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Cream rather than liquid (format)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Peach rather than rose· Balm rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Peach rather than rose · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: natural· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Milani Baked Blush in Rose D'oro, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 63 Rosewood Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade63 Rosewood PinkClosest shade matchRose D'oroHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour55%97#d17867#cf7b69Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall64
Finish50%67NaturalDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than natural
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedCombination, Dry, Normal, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 86/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Rare Beauty Soft Pinch Liquid Blush in Worth, against Armani Beauty Cheek Tint Longwear Lightweight Liquid Blush in 63 Rosewood Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade63 Rosewood PinkClosest overall alternativeWorthHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%81#d17867#da7b72Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.0 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims hydration; the match does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, Dry, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 89/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraSame price
