Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 11 dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
4.4 (2,347)·Medium tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (69%)4.2 (11,365)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· No skin-like finish claimed· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep-tan skin tones with neutral undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$34 less (81%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep with rosy cool undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin w/ very warm undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (29%)4.2 (7,617)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same olive undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: tan to deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
$8Ulta Beauty(product price)$34 less (81%)4.3 (8,153)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Satin rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Satin · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Satin rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep with rosy cool undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (62%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage· No skin-like finish claimed
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$29.01 less (69%)4.3 (3,814)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: Tan-Deep with cool undertones
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for tan to deep skin with golden undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (29%)4.2 (7,617)
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$15.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$26.01 less (62%)4.2 (1,617)
Matches: Claims transfer resistance· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ warm undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (29%)4.7 (491)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as tan, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: tan with warm warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
The closest shade to Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 11 (Medium tan · Olive · neutral olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible Full Wear Waterproof Concealer in 405 Toffee, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11Closest shade match405 ToffeeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall91
Colour60%98#cc8b59#c98a57Looks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%60MediumFullSome differenceFull coverage rather than medium
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared51
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 69/100Shade match 91/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 116 Spice, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11Closest overall alternativeCN 116 SpiceHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%98#cc8b59#ca8a5bLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
Sephora$20 less (48%)
