Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 11.75 dupes and alternatives Armani Beauty
4.4 (2,347)·Deep tan · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle red undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle brown undertones
$30Ulta Beauty(product price)$12 less (29%)4.2 (7,617)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Matte rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
36
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for deep skin w/ neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Matches: Same radiant finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · No blurring effect claimed · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Luminous rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No skin-like finish claimed · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: for dark warm skin with golden undertones
The closest shade to Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer 11.75 (Deep tan · Cool · pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear All Over Full Coverage Concealer in 560 Suede C, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11.75. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11.75Closest shade match560 Suede CHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%79#9b6852#926549Close colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Finish35%12RadiantMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedDry, combination, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Even Better All-Over Concealer + Eraser in CN 126 Espresso, against Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Hydrating Face and Under-Eye Concealer in 11.75. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade11.75Closest overall alternativeCN 126 EspressoHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour60%81#9b6852#996f5fClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Finish35%56RadiantNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than radiant
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a skin-like finish; the match does not list it
Blurring15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 2 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, dry, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 82/100Shade match 84/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$20 less (48%)
