ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer Dark/Deep 5.5C dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.3 (1,273)·Deep · Cool · pink undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral red undertones
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium-full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
77
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral red undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
71
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: very deep with a neutral undertone
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than luminous finish · Medium-full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin with cool undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: deep with neutral to golden undertones
$12Ulta Beauty(product price)$19 less (61%)4.5 (1,593)
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Natural rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Natural rather than luminous finish · Medium rather than buildable coverage · No long-wear claim
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
52
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with neutral brown undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with a balance of warm & cool undertones
Matches: Both claim long-wearing· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than luminous finish· Full rather than buildable coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than luminous finish · Full rather than buildable coverage
The closest shade to bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer Dark/Deep 5.5C (Deep · Cool · pink undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 57N rich, against bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer in Dark/Deep 5.5C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDark/Deep 5.5CClosest shade match57N richHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%84#884322#924c2aClose colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%88DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 5.2
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared38
Finish35%0LuminousMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%80BuildableFullCloseFull coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared72
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedNormal, combination, oilySkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 71/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer in 6C1, against bareMinerals ORIGINAL Liquid Mineral Brightening Concealer in Dark/Deep 5.5C. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDark/Deep 5.5CClosest overall alternative6C1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%78#884322#934e2fClose colourColour difference 3.8 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared65
Finish35%34LuminousNaturalDifferentNatural finish rather than luminous
Coverage30%100BuildableMediumCloseMedium coverage rather than buildable (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared86
Longevity30%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Not publishedDry, normal, combination, oily, sensitiveSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 78/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$14.01 less (45%)
View at Walmart