Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow Celestine dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.5 (2,244)·Silver · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (23%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Rose rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Sold as contour, rated here for use as eyeshadow (suited)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Rose rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Taupe rather than silver· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Taupe rather than silver · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Bronze rather than silver· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than silver · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than silver· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than silver · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Brown rather than silver· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than silver · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than silver· Dewy rather than matte (finish)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than silver · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Golden rather than silver· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than silver · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than silver· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than silver · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Taupe rather than silver· Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Taupe rather than silver · Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Retailer shade note: taupe topper shimmer with silver flecks
Laura Mercier Caviar Stick Eyeshadow in Moonlight, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Celestine. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCelestineClosest shade matchMoonlightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%74#ab8a81#ac948aClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightMediumCloseDepth difference 4.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100SilverSilverSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall15
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall72
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Overall match 58/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
e.l.f. Cosmetics Perfect 10 Eyeshadow Palette in Keep It Ethereal, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Celestine. Matched on pan 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCelestineClosest overall alternativeKeep It EtherealHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall75
Colour60%88#ab8a81#ae8779Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightMediumCloseDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Normal, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 75/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $6 more
