Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow Queen Phyllis dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.5 (2,244)·Golden · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Dry rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Green rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (23%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte
Differences: White rather than golden· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Nude rather than golden· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Nude rather than golden · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Nude rather than golden· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Nude rather than golden · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
51
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Retailer shade note: metallic amber gold with sparkling reflects
Maybelline Color Tattoo Longwear Multi-Use Eyeshadow Stix in I am Confident, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Queen Phyllis. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeQueen PhyllisClosest shade matchI am ConfidentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%93#f2d1b2#ebc9aaVery close colourColour difference 1.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92LightLightSameDepth difference 4.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall76
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Normal, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Lancôme Teint Idole Ultra Wear Skin Transforming Powder Bronzer in Fair, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Queen Phyllis. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeQueen PhyllisClosest overall alternativeFairHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%81#f2d1b2#ebc4a0Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightLightSameDepth difference 6.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100GoldenGoldenSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall93
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%65SheerBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than sheer
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Overall match 84/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Walmart
Ulta Beauty$11 less (50%)
Sephora
