Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow Nude Beach dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.5 (2,244)·Nude · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same format: powder
Differences: Taupe rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Taupe rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
35
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· White rather than nude· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · White rather than nude · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
34
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
24
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
24
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish, pigmentation & format
7
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Glitter rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
ILIA Eye Stylus Shadow Stick - Long-Lasting Cream Eyeshadow in Opulent, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Nude Beach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude BeachClosest shade matchOpulentHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall100
Colour60%100#dbbfb4#dbbfb4Looks identicalColour difference 0.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared23
Finish65%20MatteShimmerDifferentShimmer finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderStickDifferentStick rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall40
Longevity50%40Not listed12-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Crease resistance30%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims crease resistance; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared30
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%20Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, SensitiveSensitiveDifferentBoth marketed for sensitive skin
Overall match 67/100Shade match 100/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Cold Brew Einspanner, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Nude Beach. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeNude BeachClosest overall alternativeCold Brew EinspannerHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%80#dbbfb4#e8c1b1Close colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Normal, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$11 less (50%)
