Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow Soul dupes and alternatives bareMinerals
4.5 (2,244)·Nude · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$5 less (23%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same finish: matte
Differences: White rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Golden rather than nude· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than nude · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Green rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
32
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than nude · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same format: powder· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than nude· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
30
Visibly different colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than nude · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Sensitive rather than dry, normal, combination, oily, sensitive (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· White rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · White rather than nude · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: matte cream with subtle pink undertones
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
24
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
15
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Nude 6, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Soul. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSoulClosest shade matchNude 6How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%73#f2d0a7#f0d7bcClose colourColour difference 4.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 2.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNeutralUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall76
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared30
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%20Dry, Normal, Combination, Oily, SensitiveDryDifferentBoth marketed for dry skin
Overall match 74/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Forest Night, against bareMinerals Talc-Free Loose Mineral Eyeshadow in Soul. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSoulClosest overall alternativeForest NightHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%67#f2d0a7#e1ccb2Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared100
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableDry, Normal, Combination, Oily, SensitiveNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 81/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (59%)
Walmart
