LES BEIGES Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear BR92 dupes and alternatives Chanel
4.5 (161)·Tan · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Buildable rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· No fragrance listed· Adds SPF 15
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
25
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· No fragrance listed
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than radiant finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
28
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than radiant finish · Full rather than light coverage · No long-wear claim · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim long-wearing· Claims a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than radiant finish
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
80
Skin suitability
80
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than radiant finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$53 less (77%)4.3 (2,230)
Matches: Very close colour· Same radiant finish· Both claim long-wearing
Differences: Described as medium, yours as light· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
63
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Radiant · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Described as medium, yours as light · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than light coverage · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as light
The closest shade to Chanel LES BEIGES Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear BR92 (Tan · Cool · rosy undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
L'Oréal Paris Infallible Skin Ink 2-in-1 Foundation Concealer in 318 Tan Cool, against Chanel LES BEIGES Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear in BR92. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBR92Closest shade match318 Tan CoolHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%93#b6805e#ba7d5bVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99TanTanSameDepth difference: 0.4
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 76/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
L.A. Girl Pro Coverage Liquid Foundation in Natural, against Chanel LES BEIGES Healthy Glow Foundation Hydration and Longwear in BR92. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBR92Closest overall alternativeNaturalHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%92#b6805e#be845eVery close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96TanMedium tanCloseDepth difference: 2.7
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 85/100Shade match 87/100Low confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.