Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow Stick Diamond Girl dupes and alternatives ColourPop
4.5 (250)·Blue · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance
Differences: White rather than blue· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than blue· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than blue · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· White rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · White rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: White rather than blue· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
57
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Mauve rather than blue· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Liquid rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 24% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than blue · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Liquid rather than stick (format) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: sheer
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than blue
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: sheer· Claims crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than blue· Powder rather than stick (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than blue · Powder rather than stick (format) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: White rather than blue· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
19
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: White rather than blue· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than blue · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (pigmentation) · Palette rather than stick (format)
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Anastasia Beverly Hills Glidr Eyeshadow Stick in BLUE ICE, against ColourPop Jelly Much Gel Eyeshadow Stick in Diamond Girl. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDiamond GirlClosest matchBLUE ICEHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%81#ece3e0#e1dbd4Close colourColour difference 3.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%94LightLightSameDepth difference 3.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedCoolUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BlueBlueSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall96
Finish65%94GlitterDuochromeCloseDuochrome finish rather than glitter
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedNormal, CombinationNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 84/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $12 more
