Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: duochrome· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Blue rather than green· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Blue rather than green · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer iridescent blue sparkle
Differences: Silver rather than green· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Retailer shade note: opaque silver with silver pearl
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Silver rather than green
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Silver rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
69
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: duochrome· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
39
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 15-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: light blue to lavendar duo chrome
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: duochrome· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Blue rather than green · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sparkling transparent icy blue with duo-chrome reflects
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than green· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than green · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (46%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: duochrome· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Blue rather than green
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Blue rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: duochrome icy blue with pink reflects
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Silver rather than green
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
79
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Silver rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than green
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Duochrome
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white w/pink, violet & blue duochrome effects
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than green
Score details
Shade match
32
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white with an icy baby blue flip
Differences: Blue rather than green· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
23
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Blue rather than green · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than green
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: pale lavender with a teal flip
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than green· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than green · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: opalescent white with blue, pink, and purple pearl
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Purple rather than green
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Purple rather than green · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: pale periwinkle w/blue, pink & silver pinpoints
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.7 (163)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· White rather than green
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · White rather than green · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$17.50 less (63%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Blue rather than green· Matte rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
11
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Blue rather than green · Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Kaja Beauty Bento Stacked Eyeshadow Trio in Blueberry Bingsu, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Euphoria. Matched on pan 1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeEuphoriaClosest matchBlueberry BingsuHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%84#bfcbda#c2d4e9Close colourColour difference 3.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%91LightLightSameDepth difference 4.3 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 47/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.