Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow Love Spell dupes and alternatives Danessa Myricks Beauty
4.1 (249)·Pink · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: cool-toned baby pink with silver and pink pinpoints
Differences: Deeper· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer silvery baby pink with silver and pink sparkle
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: duochrome· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
92
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sparkling rose gold with a duo-chrome bluish-green shift
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$17.50 less (63%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Purple rather than pink· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
62
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Purple rather than pink · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Golden rather than pink· Metallic rather than duochrome (finish)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than pink · Metallic rather than duochrome (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
60
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
$17Ulta Beauty(product price)$11 less (39%)4.2 (339)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than duochrome (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
58
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Shimmer rather than duochrome (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Armani Beauty Eye Tint Long-Lasting Liquid Eyeshadow in 70M Sakura, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Love Spell. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLove SpellClosest shade match70M SakuraHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall90
Colour60%86#f9d6dd#eccbd0Very close colourColour difference 2.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%85LightLightSameDepth difference 5.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall28
Finish65%0DuochromeMatteDifferentMatte finish rather than duochrome
Pigmentation20%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format15%100LiquidLiquidSameBoth liquid
Wear & performance10% of overall73
Longevity50%70Long-wearing16-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 16-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 67/100Shade match 90/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Matte Eyeshadow in Yogurt, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Love Spell. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLove SpellClosest overall alternativeYogurtHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%82#f9d6dd#f0c8cdClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%83LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall73
Finish65%76DuochromeMetallicSome differenceMetallic finish rather than duochrome
Overall match 79/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$9 less (32%)
