Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: glitter· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: white and gold metallic glitter
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· White rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · White rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: liquid· Claims comfort
Differences: White rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Shimmer · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer white with prismatic pearls
Matches: Same format: liquid· Both claim crease resistance· Claims comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
72
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
$7Ulta Beauty(product price)$21 less (75%)4.5 (2,019)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· White rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · White rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than liquid (format)· 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
76
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Blue rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Blue rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Blue rather than golden· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Blue rather than golden · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: sheer opal with silver, pink, violet and blue sparkle
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
45
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: glitter· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Glitter
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than golden· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than golden · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
$10.50Ulta Beauty(product price)$17.50 less (63%)4.2 (1,248)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof· Claims comfort
Differences: Silver rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Silver rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Silver rather than golden· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Silver rather than golden · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than golden· Shimmer rather than glitter (finish)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than golden · Shimmer rather than glitter (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof
$26Ulta Beauty(product price)$2 less (7%)4.7 (163)
Matches: Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than golden· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than golden · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Blue rather than golden
Score details
Shade match
49
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Duochrome · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Blue rather than golden · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sparkling transparent icy blue with duo-chrome reflects
$11.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$16.01 less (57%)4.6 (13,914)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: White rather than golden· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
27
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: White rather than golden· Matte rather than glitter (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
8
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Very close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: White rather than golden · Matte rather than glitter (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Sephora Collection Colorful Eyeshadow in 100 Let It Snow, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Lust. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLustClosest shade match100 Let It SnowHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%97#f8f6f6#f7f7f7Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 54/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Clear, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Lust. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLustClosest overall alternativeClearHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall72
Colour60%95#f8f6f6#f1f1f1Looks identicalColour difference 1.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100LightLightSameDepth difference 0.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableWarmNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Comfort40%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 74/100Shade match 72/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (36%)
