Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
No match is close enough in colour to recommend as an overall alternative (shade match under 70).
More matches
Show
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Golden rather than berry· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Close colour · Glitter · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Golden rather than berry · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
$15Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (46%)4.0 (271)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Green rather than berry· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than berry · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Retailer shade note: shimmer mint with pink reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
41
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than berry· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
38
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than berry · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 14-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
34
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than berry · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
42
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than berry · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: sparkling sunlit gold with silver reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
33
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than berry
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than berry · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Green rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Green rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
A reliable match cannot be determined for this pair (low data confidence), so no score is shown.
Slight colour difference · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Golden rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
30
Finish, pigmentation & format
93
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Golden rather than berry · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· White rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
31
Finish, pigmentation & format
85
Wear & performance
85
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · White rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
36
Finish, pigmentation & format
82
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
67
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Glitter · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance
Retailer shade note: metallic amber gold with sparkling reflects
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
29
Finish, pigmentation & format
87
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Golden rather than berry· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
27
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Golden rather than berry · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Green rather than berry· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Green rather than berry · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
Matches: Same finish: metallic· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown rather than berry
Score details
Shade match
23
Finish, pigmentation & format
94
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Metallic · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown rather than berry · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Green rather than berry· Matte rather than metallic (finish)· Palette rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
26
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Green rather than berry · Matte rather than metallic (finish) · Palette rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim waterproof
about-face Fractal Glitter Eye Paint in Sour Note, against Danessa Myricks Beauty Twin Flames Liquid Eyeshadow in Olivine. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeOlivineClosest shade matchSour NoteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall62
Colour60%82#dece9d#d0c38dClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%84LightLightSome differenceDepth difference 6.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 74/100Shade match 62/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.