16HR Camo Concealer Deep Caramel dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.2 (5,664)·Medium tan · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: deep-tan skin tones with neutral undertones
Matches: Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
64
Wear & performance
100
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 31% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Deep with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Similar undertone (neutral vs cool)· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Natural rather than matte finish· Medium rather than full coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Described as medium tan, yours as deep
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD2.75 - Medium-deep with warm undertones, and a deep peach tone
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Described as medium tan, yours as deep
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Described as medium tan, yours as deep · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD2.5 - Medium-deep with cool undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 12-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Described as medium, yours as deep
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
77
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Described as medium, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Retailer shade note: MD2 - Medium to medium-deep with warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as medium, yours as deep
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than full coverage
Retailer shade note: deep tan with warm undertones
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Described as tan, yours as deep· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Described as tan, yours as deep · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Tan with neutral undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Described as tan, yours as deep
Score details
Shade match
40
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
61
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Described as tan, yours as deep · Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: Tan with neutral warm undertones
Low confidence· Digital matchRetailer descriptions disagree: described as tan, yours as deep
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer Deep Caramel (Medium tan · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Flawless Long-Wear Blur Concealer in 12 Tan-Deep, against e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Deep Caramel. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeDeep CaramelClosest match12 Tan-DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall73
Colour60%57#ce812f#d38753Slight colour differenceColour difference 6.5 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared89
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%100FullFullSameSame full coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared61
Longevity30%6016-hour wear24-hour wearSome difference24-hour wear claimed against 16-hour wear
Transfer resistance20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims transfer resistance; your product does not list it
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Oily, combination, normalNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for oily/normal skin
Overall match 75/100Shade match 73/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $27 more
