16HR Camo Concealer Light Peach dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.2 (5,664)·Light · Cool · rosy undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly warmer undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same full coverage· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
84
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim a lightweight feel
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: fair skin tones with neutral undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Slightly warmer undertone
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 32% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Slightly warmer undertone · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Medium rather than full coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination skin
Matches: Same matte finish· Same full coverage· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination skin
Retailer shade note: fair-light skin tones with pink-neutral undertones
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer Light Peach (Light · Cool · rosy undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Hydrating + De-puffing Concealer in 04 Fair Neutral, against e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Light Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight PeachClosest shade match04 Fair NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour60%68#ccbeb1#d1b7aaSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared55
Finish35%56MatteNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than matte
Coverage30%60FullMediumSome differenceMedium coverage rather than full
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a blurring or smoothing effect; your product does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared68
Longevity30%7016-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 16-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims not settling into pores or fine lines; the match does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Oily, combination, normalNormal, dry, oilyBoth marketed for oily/normal skin
Overall match 66/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
IT Cosmetics Bye Bye Under Eye Full Coverage Anti-Aging Water-Resistant Concealer in 11.5 Light Beige, against e.l.f. Cosmetics 16HR Camo Concealer in Light Peach. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeLight PeachClosest overall alternative11.5 Light BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall70
Colour60%51#ccbeb1#e0bea8Slight colour differenceColour difference 7.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96LightLightSameDepth difference: 2.3
Retailer descriptionLightNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 73/100Shade match 70/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $23 more
View at Target
