Camo Liquid Blush Bronze Bombshell dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.7 (54,760)·Terracotta · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Lighter· Red rather than terracotta· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Red rather than terracotta · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Brown / nude rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Lighter· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Red Brown Rosy Bronze Bliush Trio
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Red rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Red rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Golden rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Golden rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Sold as bronzer, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
35
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Rose rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
48
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Rose rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone
Score details
Shade match
43
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
55
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 10-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than terracotta · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: rich berry / deep with warm-neutral undertones
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Red rather than terracotta
Score details
Shade match
47
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Red rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Charlotte Tilbury Airbrush Powder Blush Blur in Pillow Talk Dreams, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Bronze Bombshell. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBronze BombshellClosest shade matchPillow Talk DreamsHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall84
Colour55%91#7b372a#813930Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%96Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 2.2 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 70/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Color Fuse Longwear Hydrating Glassy Lip + Cheek Blush Balm Stick in Glassy Clove, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Bronze Bombshell. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBronze BombshellClosest overall alternativeGlassy CloveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall71
Colour55%72#7b372a#89423aClose colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%81Deep / darkDeep / darkSome differenceDepth difference 7.0 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 76/100Shade match 71/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $17 more
