Camo Liquid Blush Comin' In Hot Pink dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.7 (54,760)·Pink · Neutral · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Red rather than pink· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
66
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Red rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
78
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Red rather than pink · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than pink · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Sold as lipstick, rated here for use as blush (suited)
Matches: Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
46
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Visibly different colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 26% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than pink · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same format: liquid· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Rose rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
83
Comfort & skin suitability
63
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Normal rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
57
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Slight colour difference · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than pink · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Rose rather than pink· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
54
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Rose rather than pink · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: Rich Mid-Tone Rose Petal Pink Trio
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than pink· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish, pigmentation & format
86
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
66
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than pink · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Powder rather than liquid (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone
Score details
Shade match
60
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Visibly different colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format)
MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Liquid Lip & Cheek Mousse in Billion $ Smile, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Comin' In Hot Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeComin' In Hot PinkClosest shade matchBillion $ SmileHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour55%75#d9285c#d21e4aClose colourColour difference 4.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93MediumMediumSameDepth difference 3.6 on the 0–100 scale
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 2 of 3 compared80
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 79/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Intense Guava, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Comin' In Hot Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeComin' In Hot PinkClosest overall alternativeIntense GuavaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall82
Colour55%73#d9285c#ee2a66Close colourColour difference 4.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%84MediumMediumSome differenceDepth difference 6.3 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 90/100Shade match 82/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $32 more
