Camo Liquid Blush Copper Etiquette dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.7 (54,760)·Terracotta · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Powder rather than liquid (format)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Stick rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
70
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Looks identical · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid
Differences: Red rather than terracotta· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than terracotta · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Red rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
61
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: liquid· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
65
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Very close colour · Natural · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Coral rather than terracotta· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
42
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Coral rather than terracotta · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Sensitive rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Brown / nude rather than terracotta· Powder rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown / nude rather than terracotta · Powder rather than liquid (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than terracotta· Cream rather than liquid (format)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than terracotta · Cream rather than liquid (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Coral rather than terracotta· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
71
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Coral rather than terracotta · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Balm rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Red rather than terracotta· Matte rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish, pigmentation & format
63
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Red rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than liquid (format) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
61
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than terracotta · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · Opaque rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Stick rather than liquid (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
DIBS Beauty Desert Island Duo Blush + Bronzer Stick in Shade 4 - Not So Basic / Iced Chai, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Copper Etiquette. Matched on the Not So Basic pan. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCopper EtiquetteClosest shade matchShade 4 - Not So Basic / Iced ChaiHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%88#c95a49#c36353Very close colourColour difference 2.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100TerracottaTerracottaSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall70
Finish50%67DewyNaturalSome differenceNatural finish rather than dewy
Overall match 78/100Shade match 93/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Huda Beauty Blush Filter Soft Glow Liquid Blush in Strawberry Cream, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Camo Liquid Blush in Copper Etiquette. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCopper EtiquetteClosest overall alternativeStrawberry CreamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall70
Colour55%66#c95a49#ca5d5cSlight colour differenceColour difference 5.5 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.5 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 83/100Shade match 70/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $17 more
