Hydrating Camo Concealer Tan Sand dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.3 (8,153)·Light · Olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Slightly deeper· Slightly warmer undertone· Natural rather than satin finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Slightly warmer undertone · Natural rather than satin finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than satin finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Radiant finish
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than satin finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than satin finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
78
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than satin finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/combination/normal skin
The closest shade to e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer Tan Sand (Light · Olive undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
L'Oréal Paris True Match Radiant Serum Concealer in W7, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Hydrating Camo Concealer in Tan Sand. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeTan SandClosest matchW7How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%93#f4b786#fdbc8bVery close colourColour difference 1.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference: 3.1
Retailer descriptionTanNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared64
Finish35%78SatinRadiantCloseRadiant finish rather than satin
Coverage30%—not comparableFullNot listedNot comparedCoverage not listed for one product
Skin-like finish20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims a skin-like finish; your product does not list it
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared100
Longevity30%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Settling20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall0
Skin type100%0Dry, combination, normalSensitiveMarketed for different skin types
Overall match 75/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $22 more
View at Walmart
