Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
59
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Lighter· Taupe rather than nude· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Taupe rather than nude · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Lighter· Brown rather than nude· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Golden rather than nude· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Golden rather than nude · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than nude· Shimmer rather than matte (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
48
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than nude · Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
NYX Professional Makeup Lid Lingerie Cream Eye Pigment in Beige Appeal, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow in Beige & Boujee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeige & BoujeeClosest shade matchBeige AppealHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall87
Colour60%79#bb8869#bd836bClose colourColour difference 3.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared11
Finish65%5MatteMetallicDifferentMetallic finish rather than matte
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared59
Longevity50%70Long-wearing24-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 24-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Overall match 59/100Shade match 87/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Liqua-Play Eye Shadow in Fawn Matte, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow in Beige & Boujee. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeBeige & BoujeeClosest overall alternativeFawn MatteHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall80
Colour60%85#bb8869#b08769Close colourColour difference 3.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 83/100Shade match 80/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $22 more
