Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow Ginger Snap dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.6 (15,123)·Brown · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Stick rather than powder (format)· 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: shimmery rose golds & cool-toned matte neutrals
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Bronze rather than brown· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish, pigmentation & format
68
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Bronze rather than brown · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Terracotta rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Terracotta rather than brown· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Terracotta rather than brown · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same pigmentation: opaque· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Stick rather than powder (format)· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
38
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
22
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Metallic · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Metallic rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Stick rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
RMS Beauty Cashmere Matte Eyelights in Mossy Stone, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow in Ginger Snap. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeGinger SnapClosest matchMossy StoneHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall97
Colour60%95#99523c#94533fLooks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableNot listedNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Colour family25%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format30% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish65%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Pigmentation20%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Longevity50%70Long-wearing8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims 8-hour wear; your product says long-wearing without hours
Overall match 90/100Shade match 97/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
32 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $17 more
