Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow Currant Mood dupes and alternatives e.l.f. Cosmetics
4.6 (15,123)·Plum · Cool · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar eyeshadow overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 30%, wear and performance 10%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar eyeshadow on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim crease resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Mauve rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Mauve rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: matte· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Stick rather than powder (format) · 11-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
61
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Both claim crease resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Liquid rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
53
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Claims hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Brown rather than plum· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Brown rather than plum · Cream rather than powder (format) · 8-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Terracotta rather than plum· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish, pigmentation & format
83
Wear & performance
78
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Terracotta rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Brown rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
52
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Brown rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: opaque· Same format: powder
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than cool undertone· Terracotta rather than plum
Score details
Shade match
54
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than cool undertone · Terracotta rather than plum · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Berry rather than plum· Stick rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
88
Wear & performance
55
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Berry rather than plum · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same finish: matte· Both claim crease resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Warm rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
81
Comfort & skin suitability
80
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Warm rather than cool undertone · Taupe rather than plum · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Taupe rather than plum· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
50
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Taupe rather than plum · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim crease resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim crease resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
31
Wear & performance
73
Comfort & skin suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than matte (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Danessa Myricks Beauty Colorfix - Multi-Use Eye, Cheek & Lip Waterproof Liquid Pigment in Vamp, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow in Currant Mood. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCurrant MoodClosest shade matchVampHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall86
Colour60%78#905954#965f61Close colourColour difference 3.9 (0 is identical)
Depth15%93Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.7 on the 0–100 scale
Format15%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance10% of overall70
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Crease resistance30%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims crease resistance; the match does not list it
Waterproof20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims waterproof wear; your product does not list it
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Comfort40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableNot listedDryNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 83/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Morphe ChromaPlus 6-Pan Eyeshadow Palette in Rich Glitch, against e.l.f. Cosmetics Liquid Velvet Eyeshadow in Currant Mood. Matched on pan 4. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeCurrant MoodClosest overall alternativeRich GlitchHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall83
Colour60%72#905954#8b5d61Close colourColour difference 4.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 1.0 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone—not comparableCoolNot listedUndertone unknown on one side
Overall match 85/100Shade match 83/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta BeautyCosts $8 more
