Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
Ranked by the shade match: colour, depth and undertone only. Each row leads with its shade match; the overall match is beneath it.
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (6%)4.3 (600)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims not settling into lines· Claims colour stability
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
43
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
$49Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (6%)4.3 (600)
Matches: Claims not settling into lines· Claims colour stability· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
43
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
$14Ulta Beauty(product price)$38 less (73%)4.1 (33)
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than matte finish· Light rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
43
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than matte finish · Light rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same matte finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
67
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 20% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry skin
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (19%)4.4 (38)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
45
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
$42Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (19%)4.4 (38)
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
45
Skin suitability
84
Close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish· Buildable rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Buildable rather than medium coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same matte finish· Same medium coverage· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
45
Skin suitability
30
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/combination skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
68
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily skin
Matches: Same medium coverage· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than olive undertone· Natural rather than matte finish
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
0
Close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than olive undertone · Natural rather than matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Slightly lighter· Natural rather than matte finish· No long-wear claim
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
76
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
90
Colour not compared · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Natural rather than matte finish · No long-wear claim · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation 5W1.5 Cinnamon (Medium · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Rare Beauty True to Myself Natural Matte Longwear Foundation in 34 Medium Deep Warm, against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation in 5W1.5 Cinnamon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5W1.5 CinnamonClosest shade match34 Medium Deep WarmHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall88
Colour60%82#dc8858#d28750Close colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 80/100Shade match 88/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Bobbi Brown Weightless Skin Oil-Controlling Foundation SPF 15 in Warm Golden (W-076), against Estée Lauder Double Wear Stay-in-Place Foundation in 5W1.5 Cinnamon. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade5W1.5 CinnamonClosest overall alternativeWarm Golden (W-076)How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall85
Colour60%85#dc8858#cf8858Close colourColour difference 3.1 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 2 of 4 compared100
Finish35%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Coverage30%100MediumMediumSameSame medium coverage
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a blurring or smoothing effect
Wear & performance15% of overall · 4 of 5 compared75
Longevity30%7036-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 36-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance20%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Settling20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims not settling into pores or fine lines; your product does not list it
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable, lightweight feel
Skin suitability5% of overall60
Skin type100%60Dry, combination, oilyNormal, combination, oilyBoth marketed for combination/oily skin
Overall match 86/100Shade match 85/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora$14 less (27%)
