Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 14 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.5 (2,588)·Medium tan · Olive · warm olive undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
82
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Same light coverage
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
79
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium with yellow undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Light-medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Light-medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Light-medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
56
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same olive undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium-deep with olive undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for medium to tan skin with rosy neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims not settling into lines
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
56
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 16-hour wear
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium to tan skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium to tan shade, warm undertone
$38Ulta Beauty(product price)$3 less (7%)4.0 (122)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (39%)4.4 (33)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Contains listed fragrance · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium deep with warm undertone
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: medium with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
90
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims 24-hour wear
Differences: Slightly lighter· Warm rather than olive undertone· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Warm rather than olive undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: medium skin with golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than olive undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 14 (Medium tan · Olive · warm olive undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Bobbi Brown Vitamin Enriched Skin Tinted Moisturizer SPF 15 in Golden 3, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 14. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14Closest shade matchGolden 3How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour60%91#bf8d5a#c58f53Very close colourColour difference 2.2 (0 is identical)
Overall match 82/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Armani Beauty Luminous Silk Foundation in 8.1, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 14. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade14Closest overall alternative8.1How they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall92
Colour60%95#bf8d5a#bd8953Looks identicalColour difference 1.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 86/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.