Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 25 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.5 (2,588)·Rich deep · Neutral undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same light coverage· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/normal/oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: dark deep to rich - neutral, slightly warm
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for normal/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: espresso - rich brown skin with pink undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Buildable rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (61%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same light coverage· Claims 12-hour wear· Adds SPF 30
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep espresso with cool undertones
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Natural matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed
Retailer shade note: deep shade with neutral-to-warm undertones
Matches: Claims long-wearing· Claims not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
51
Skin suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance
Retailer shade note: for the deepest darkest skin w/ a cool undertone
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Buildable rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: deep ebony with neutral undertone
Matches: Claims a skin-like finish· Claims long-wearing· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
50
Close colour · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing· Adds SPF 50
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone· Full rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly cooler undertone · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest cool with red undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 18-hour wear
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Both claim a blurring effect· Claims 12-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: very deep skin with very warm, rosy undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Visibly different colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for dry/normal skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: ultra deep with deep-neutral undertones
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: very deep, neutral undertones
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 25 (Rich deep · Neutral undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Patrick Ta Major Skin Hydra-Luxe Luminous Skin Perfecting Foundation in 30 Rich Neutral, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 25. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade25Closest shade match30 Rich NeutralHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour60%82#281101#34180cClose colourColour difference 3.4 (0 is identical)
Overall match 75/100Shade match 89/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Haus Labs Triclone Skin Tech Medium Coverage Foundation in 590 Deep, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 25. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade25Closest overall alternative590 DeepHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall79
Colour60%64#281101#381c06Slight colour differenceColour difference 5.7 (0 is identical)
Overall match 77/100Shade match 79/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $11 more
Walmart
