Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 3 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.5 (2,588)·Fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
98
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Light with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: light with pink neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
56
Skin suitability
20
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same neutral undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$16 less (39%)4.2 (812)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims a skin-like finish
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
80
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than neutral undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Similar undertone (warm vs neutral)· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
62
Wear & performance
65
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: Light to medium, warm undertones
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 3 (Fair · Neutral · neutral golden undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Clinique Even Better Makeup Broad Spectrum SPF 15 Foundation in WN 44 Tea, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 3. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade3Closest matchWN 44 TeaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#edc69b#efc8a0Looks identicalColour difference 1.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98FairFairSameDepth difference: 1.1
Retailer descriptionLightFairSome differenceRetailer descriptions one depth band apart
Overall match 86/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $28 more
