Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 9 dupes and alternatives Fenty Beauty
4.5 (2,588)·Medium light · Warm undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar foundation overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar foundation on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance· Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish & visual result
89
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Natural · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: MD1 - Medium-deep with warm undertones, and a golden tone
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
59
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 23% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage· Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Not marketed for combination/dry/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same natural finish· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium-dark with neutral undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Contains drying alcohol
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Medium rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 19% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: medium with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone· Buildable rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
93
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than warm undertone · Buildable rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: Medium skin with neutral-olive undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
70
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same natural finish
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
73
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Medium rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Not marketed for combination/dry/normal/oily skin
Retailer shade note: medium light tan, bright-golden undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same light coverage
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim a lightweight feel
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Radiant · Light coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Radiant rather than natural finish · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for combination/oily skin
Retailer shade note: Medium with golden undertones
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
97
Finish & visual result
68
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Natural matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 22% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
$16Ulta Beauty(product price)$25 less (61%)4.0 (94)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Medium rather than light coverage
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
66
Skin suitability
100
Looks identical · Matte · Medium coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 25% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Medium rather than light coverage · Does not claim transfer resistance
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$28.01 less (68%)4.4 (41,209)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Claims long-wearing
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than light coverage· No blurring effect claimed
Score details
Shade match
99
Finish & visual result
47
Wear & performance
40
Skin suitability
50
Looks identical · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than light coverage · No blurring effect claimed · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim a lightweight feel
The closest shade to Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint 9 (Medium light · Warm undertone) in each concealer range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Concealer shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest shade match works
Milani Conceal + Perfect 2-in-1 Foundation in Natural Beige, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade9Closest shade matchNatural BeigeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour60%99#d9a677#d8a678Looks identicalColour difference 0.3 (0 is identical)
Finish & visual result25% of overall · 3 of 4 compared47
Finish35%56NaturalMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than natural
Coverage30%40LightFullDifferentFull coverage rather than light (buildable: one step of tolerance)
Skin-like finish20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists a skin-like finish
Blurring15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a blurring or smoothing effect; the match does not list it
Wear & performance15% of overall · 3 of 5 compared40
Longevity30%40Not listedLong-wearingSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance20%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Settling20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists not settling into pores or fine lines
Colour stability15%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot claimed by eitherNeither product lists colour stability (no oxidation)
Comfort15%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable, lightweight feel; the match does not list it
Skin suitability5% of overall50
Skin type100%50Combination, dry, normal, oily, sensitiveNot publishedSkin-type suitability not published for one product
Overall match 75/100Shade match 99/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Microsmooth Multi-Tasking Baked Face Powder Foundation in 35 Bronze, against Fenty Beauty Eaze Drop Lightweight Blurring Skin Tint in 9. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade9Closest overall alternative35 BronzeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall96
Colour60%94#d9a677#d5a57cVery close colourColour difference 1.6 (0 is identical)
Overall match 91/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
33 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$22.80 less (56%)
