Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than dewy (finish)· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
73
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than dewy (finish) · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: mini matte peachy pink (no shimmer)
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Stick rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Stick rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Coral rather than pink· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Coral rather than pink · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: shimmering deep coral with gold pearl
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Liquid rather than powder (format)· 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Liquid rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same pigmentation: buildable· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
90
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same neutral undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same finish: dewy· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than pink
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than pink · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same format: powder· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
69
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same pigmentation: buildable· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Natural rather than dewy (finish)· Balm rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
89
Very close colour · Natural · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Natural rather than dewy (finish) · Balm rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Lancôme Blush Subtil Oil-Free Powder Blush in 351 Blushing Trésor, against Gucci Luminous Matte Powder Blush in 03 Radiant Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade03 Radiant PinkClosest shade match351 Blushing TrésorHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall93
Colour55%98#f8878a#fa878cLooks identicalColour difference 0.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%60NeutralWarmSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall44
Finish50%45DewyMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than dewy
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%20PowderLiquidDifferentLiquid rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 81/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Geller Baked Blush-n-Brighten Marbleized Blush in Pink Buttercream, against Gucci Luminous Matte Powder Blush in 03 Radiant Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade03 Radiant PinkClosest overall alternativePink ButtercreamHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall89
Colour55%81#f8878a#e4898aClose colourColour difference 3.6 (0 is identical)
Depth15%95LightLightSameDepth difference 3.1 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 92/100Shade match 89/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.