Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration· Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
94
Finish, pigmentation & format
64
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
53
Very close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cream rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · 24-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Pink rather than rose· 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
91
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
37
Very close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Peach rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish, pigmentation & format
75
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same format: powder· Claims comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Pink rather than rose· Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
80
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
72
Very close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Pink rather than rose · Sheer rather than buildable (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Balm rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown / nude rather than rose · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Balm rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than rose· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
84
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Looks identical · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than rose · Cream rather than powder (format) · 12-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Peach rather than rose· Satin rather than matte (finish)· Balm rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than rose · Satin rather than matte (finish) · Balm rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Not listed rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Normal, Combination, Sensitive rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Patrick Ta Major Headlines Double-Take Crème & Powder Blush Duo in She's Seductive, against Gucci Luminous Matte Powder Blush in 05 Rosy Beige. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade05 Rosy BeigeClosest matchShe's SeductiveHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%96#cb776d#c87a71Looks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared64
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%—not comparableBuildableNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Format25%35PowderCreamDifferentCream rather than powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 87/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
31 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.