Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity)· Does not claim hydration· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: 16-hour wear rather than long-wearing (longevity) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: mini matte peachy pink (no shimmer)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Cream rather than powder (format)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
56
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
73
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Cream rather than powder (format) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same pigmentation: buildable· Same longevity: long-wearing
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish)· Liquid rather than powder (format)· Does not claim hydration
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & skin suitability
48
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Dewy rather than matte (finish) · Liquid rather than powder (format) · Does not claim hydration · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than normal, combination, oily (skin types)
RMS Beauty ReDimension Hydra Powder Blush in Pomegranate Fizz, against Gucci Luminous Matte Powder Blush in 04 Bright Coral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade04 Bright CoralClosest shade matchPomegranate FizzHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall99
Colour55%98#e77f79#e6807cLooks identicalColour difference 0.8 (0 is identical)
Depth15%100MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.2 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall73
Finish50%45MatteDewySome differenceDewy finish rather than matte
Overall match 91/100Shade match 99/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Clinique Cheek Pop Powder Blush in Pink Honey Pop, against Gucci Luminous Matte Powder Blush in 04 Bright Coral. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade04 Bright CoralClosest overall alternativePink Honey PopHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%97#e77f79#e27d76Looks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97MediumMediumSameDepth difference 1.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall80
Finish50%78MatteNaturalCloseNatural finish rather than matte
Pigmentation25%65BuildableSheerSome differenceSheer rather than buildable
Format25%100PowderPowderSameBoth powder
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Longevity50%100Long-wearingLong-wearingSameBoth products claim long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 92/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.