Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer 6C1 dupes and alternatives Laura Mercier
4.6 (1,916)·Deep · Cool undertone
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth and undertone only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar concealer overall, scored on shade match (55%), finish and visual result (25%), wear and performance (15%) and skin suitability (5%).
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar concealer on shade, finish, wear and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium-full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
40
Looks identical · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
20
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with neutral undertones
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect
Differences: Slightly lighter· Full rather than medium coverage· Does not claim not settling into lines
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle red undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a skin-like finish· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Radiant rather than natural finish· Medium-full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
61
Wear & performance
82
Skin suitability
40
Very close colour · Radiant · Medium-full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 16% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Radiant rather than natural finish · Medium-full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deepest with neutral warm undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim not settling into lines· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Not marketed for oily/sensitive skin
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with warm, peach undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Olive rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
91
Wear & performance
47
Skin suitability
20
Close colour · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 21% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/combination/oily/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with neutral undertones
Matches: Very close colour· Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone· Matte rather than natural finish· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Very close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly warmer undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deeper skin with warm, golden undertones
Matches: Claims a blurring effect· Both claim 16-hour wear· Both claim not settling into lines
Differences: Slightly lighter· Olive rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
55
Wear & performance
86
Skin suitability
60
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Olive rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for dry/sensitive skin · Contains listed fragrance
Retailer shade note: deep skin with very warm, golden or olive undertones
Matches: Same natural finish· Claims a blurring effect· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Full rather than medium coverage
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
81
Wear & performance
58
Skin suitability
60
Slight colour difference · Natural · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for combination/sensitive skin
Retailer shade note: extra deep with subtle brown undertones
$10.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$23.01 less (68%)4.1 (2,823)
Matches: Same natural finish· Both claim a lightweight feel
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Slightly deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
63
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
54
Skin suitability
20
Slight colour difference · Natural finish
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Slightly deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · No long-wear claim · Does not claim not settling into lines · Not marketed for dry/normal/combination/oily skin
Differences: Slightly lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than natural finish
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
58
Wear & performance
72
Skin suitability
80
Close colour · Matte · Full coverage
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Slightly lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than natural finish · Full rather than medium coverage · Does not claim a lightweight feel · Not marketed for sensitive skin · Contains drying alcohol
Retailer shade note: for very deep skin w/ neutral undertones
The closest shade to Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer 6C1 (Deep · Cool undertone) in each foundation range, compared on measured colour, depth and undertone. Price never changes the order.
Foundation shade colours are sampled from retailer swatch images, so check the shade on the retailer page before buying.
Why the closest match works
Tarte Shape Tape Full Coverage Matte Concealer in 57N rich, against Laura Mercier Real Flawless Weightless Perfecting Serum Concealer in 6C1. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade6C1Closest match57N richHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour60%97#934e2f#924c2aLooks identicalColour difference 1.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%98DeepDeepSameDepth difference: 1.0
Retailer descriptionDeepNot statedNo depth word in one descriptionNot compared
Overall match 83/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth and undertone; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and skin suitability. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.