Locked Kiss Ink Lipstick Posh dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.5 (888)·Brown · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (63%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$12.99Ulta Beauty(product price)$22.01 less (63%)4.4 (280,394)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
52
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Buildable rather than opaque (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Buildable rather than opaque (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
65
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Nude rather than brown· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
40
Slight colour difference · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Nude rather than brown · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 17% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Nude rather than brown · 16-hour wear rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: matte· Same opacity: opaque
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Visibly different colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Not listed rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
$25Ulta Beauty(product price)$10 less (29%)4.6 (2,318)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same opacity: opaque· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Nude rather than brown
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
88
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Nude rather than brown · Long-wearing rather than 24-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Revlon Super Lustrous Lipstick in Coffee Bean, against MAC Cosmetics Locked Kiss Ink Lipstick in Posh. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePoshClosest shade matchCoffee BeanHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall86
Colour60%77#8f441d#943e00Close colourColour difference 4.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.9 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableMatteNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableOpaqueNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall40
Longevity60%4024-hour wearNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims long wear; the match does not list it
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 73/100Shade match 86/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics M·A·Cximal Silky Matte Lipstick in Iconic Photo, against MAC Cosmetics Locked Kiss Ink Lipstick in Posh. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePoshClosest overall alternativeIconic PhotoHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall84
Colour60%76#8f441d#984e2fClose colourColour difference 4.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%87Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 5.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100BrownBrownSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall100
Finish55%100MatteMatteSameSame matte finish
Opacity45%100OpaqueOpaqueSameSame opaque opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall37
Longevity60%3524-hour wear12-hour wearDifferent12-hour wear claimed against 24-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 81/100Shade match 84/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.