Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint Posh Pit dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (837)·Nude · Warm · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
89
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 55% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
85
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Peach rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Looks identical · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Brown rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Brown rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$6.49$12.99Ulta Beauty$17.51 less (73%)4.1 (18,785)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
45
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
$12.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.51 less (48%)4.3 (43,095)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than nude· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than nude · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Berry rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Berry rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Brown rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Brown rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Brown rather than nude· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
30
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 2% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Brown rather than nude · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
NYX Professional Makeup Lip IV Hydrating Gloss Stain in Drippin Nude, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in Posh Pit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePosh PitClosest shade matchDrippin NudeHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall94
Colour60%90#a03a35#99423aVery close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.5 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableSheer tintNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 80/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Sheer-Shine Lipstick in Business Casual, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in Posh Pit. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadePosh PitClosest overall alternativeBusiness CasualHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall91
Colour60%87#a03a35#ad3c38Very close colourColour difference 2.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkMediumCloseDepth difference 3.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall94
Finish55%89Sheer tintGlossyCloseGlossy finish rather than sheer tint
Opacity45%100SheerSheerSameSame sheer opacity
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 86/100Shade match 91/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta BeautyCosts $1 more
Sephora
