Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint Soda Poppy dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (837)·Red · Neutral · Deep / dark
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 55% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Retailer shade note: a showstopping cool candy apple red to add pizzazz to your pout
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (54%)4.3 (23,361)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than red· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
84
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than red · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same finish: sheer tint· Same opacity: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Brown rather than red· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Brown rather than red · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (54%)4.3 (23,361)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim hydration
$11Ulta Beauty(product price)$13 less (54%)4.3 (23,361)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
88
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 18% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than red· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than red · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim hydration
Differences: Lighter· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than neutral undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Deeper· Cool rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than red
Score details
Shade match
66
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Cool rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than red · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$12.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.51 less (48%)4.3 (43,095)
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone· Plum rather than red· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
70
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than neutral undertone · Plum rather than red · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Warm rather than neutral undertone· Berry rather than red
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Warm rather than neutral undertone · Berry rather than red · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Juvia's Place The Reds Cherry Velvety Matte Lipstick in Afrik, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in Soda Poppy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSoda PoppyClosest shade matchAfrikHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall93
Colour60%91#840e21#8a1c27Very close colourColour difference 2.1 (0 is identical)
Depth15%92Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 3.9 on the 0–100 scale
Overall match 76/100Shade match 93/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10HR Liquid Lipstick in 94 Cherry Moon, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in Soda Poppy. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSoda PoppyClosest overall alternative94 Cherry MoonHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall88
Colour60%89#840e21#7e1d28Very close colourColour difference 2.4 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99Deep / darkDeep / darkSameDepth difference 0.6 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%60NeutralCoolSome differenceOne side neutral: partial agreement
Colour family13%100RedRedSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall38
Finish55%45Sheer tintMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than sheer tint
Opacity45%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall94
Longevity60%9012-hour wear10-hour wearClose10-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 80/100Shade match 88/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty$11.01 less (46%)
