Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint Sneaky Pink dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (837)·Pink · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same opacity: sheer· Both claim hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish & visual result
94
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Glossy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 55% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
40
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Berry rather than pink· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Berry rather than pink · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
66
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: sheer tint· Same opacity: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Warm rather than cool undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
64
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Warm rather than cool undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
59
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Same finish: sheer tint· Same opacity: sheer· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Neutral rather than cool undertone
Score details
Shade match
59
Finish & visual result
100
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Sheer tint · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than pink · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Gucci Oil-In-Water Tint Hydrating Lip Stain in 415 Clara Pink, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in Sneaky Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSneaky PinkClosest shade match415 Clara PinkHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#ec5875#ea5277Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall · none of 2 comparable50
Finish55%—not comparableSheer tintNot listedNot listed for eitherA finish not listed for one product
Opacity45%—not comparableSheerNot listedNot listed for eitherAn opacity not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall58
Longevity60%7012-hour wearLong-wearingSome differenceYour product claims 12-hour wear; the match says long-wearing without hours
Transfer resistance40%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims transfer resistance; the match does not list it
Comfort & suitability5% of overall70
Comfort50%40ClaimedNot listedSome differenceOnly your product claims a comfortable feel; the match does not list it
Overall match 79/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Laura Mercier Petal Soft Lipstick Crayon in 321 Ophélie, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in Sneaky Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeSneaky PinkClosest overall alternative321 OphélieHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall95
Colour60%92#ec5875#f35972Very close colourColour difference 2.0 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 1.7 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100CoolCoolSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall70
Finish55%45Sheer tintMatteSome differenceMatte finish rather than sheer tint
Overall match 87/100Shade match 95/100High confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $11 more
