Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint XOXO dupes and alternatives MAC Cosmetics
4.7 (837)·Nude · Warm · Medium
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar lipstick overall: shade match 60%, finish and visual result 20%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar lipstick on shade, finish, wear and comfort together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
$6.49$12.99Ulta Beauty$17.51 less (73%)4.1 (18,785)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear
Differences: Red rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
100
Comfort & suitability
40
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim comfort · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance
Differences: Red rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
$12.49Ulta Beauty(product price)$11.51 less (48%)4.3 (43,095)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
67
Wear & performance
64
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Satin
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Mauve rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Mauve rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)· Does not claim transfer resistance
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
91
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
70
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Deeper· Rose rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Rose rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
81
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 11% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Rose rather than nude· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Rose rather than nude · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than nude· Buildable rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish & visual result
65
Wear & performance
82
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 4% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than nude · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Long-wearing rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Very close colour· Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Satin rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Satin · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 6% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Satin rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Peach rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
71
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
70
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Peach rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Rose rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish & visual result
38
Wear & performance
61
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Matte · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Rose rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 24-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim hydration
Matches: Same longevity: 12-hour wear· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone· Red rather than nude· Matte rather than sheer tint (finish)
Score details
Shade match
67
Finish & visual result
54
Wear & performance
76
Comfort & suitability
100
Close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 10% ingredient overlap
Differences: Cool rather than warm undertone · Red rather than nude · Matte rather than sheer tint (finish) · Buildable rather than sheer (opacity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Both claim hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Red rather than nude· Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish & visual result
50
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & suitability
100
Very close colour
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Red rather than nude · Not listed rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim hydration
Differences: Red rather than nude· Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish)· Opaque rather than sheer (opacity)
Score details
Shade match
76
Finish & visual result
46
Wear & performance
58
Comfort & suitability
70
Close colour · Shimmer · Opaque
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Red rather than nude · Shimmer rather than sheer tint (finish) · Opaque rather than sheer (opacity) · 6-hour wear rather than 12-hour wear (longevity) · Does not claim transfer resistance · Does not claim comfort
Urban Decay Vice Lip Bond Glossy Longwear Liquid Lipstick in PDA, against MAC Cosmetics Lustreglass Stainglass Long-wearing Glossy Lip Tint in XOXO. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shadeXOXOClosest matchPDAHow they compareScore
Shade match60% of overall96
Colour60%94#c12f37#b9363bVery close colourColour difference 1.7 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99MediumMediumSameDepth difference 0.8 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone13%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family13%100NudeNudeSameSame colour family
Finish & visual result20% of overall63
Finish55%89Sheer tintGlossyCloseGlossy finish rather than sheer tint
Opacity45%30SheerOpaqueDifferentOpaque rather than sheer
Wear & performance15% of overall88
Longevity60%8012-hour wear16-hour wearClose16-hour wear claimed against 12-hour wear
Transfer resistance40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim transfer resistance
Comfort & suitability5% of overall100
Comfort50%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Overall match 88/100Shade match 96/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish and visual result, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Sephora
Ulta Beauty(product price)Costs $1 more
