Fit Me Blush 20 Mauve dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (43,306)·Mauve · Cool · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Very close colour · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 8-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
66
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): no ingredient list for one product
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort
Differences: Lighter· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Rose rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
75
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Rose rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Claims waterproof· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural· Both claim comfort
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 9% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
80
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
73
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
77
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Claims transfer resistance· Both claim comfort
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Warm rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Lighter· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
72
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
85
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 14% ingredient overlap
Differences: Lighter · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone· Pink rather than mauve· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
78
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than cool undertone · Pink rather than mauve · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A nude pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same cool undertone· Same finish: natural
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Deeper· Pink rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
58
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Deeper · Pink rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Pink rather than mauve· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
69
Finish, pigmentation & format
67
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
100
Slight colour difference · Dewy
Ingredients (not scored): 12% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Pink rather than mauve · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Same cool undertone· Claims transfer resistance· Claims waterproof
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Lighter· Dewy rather than natural (finish)
Score details
Shade match
68
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Slight colour difference · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 13% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Lighter · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour· Neutral rather than cool undertone· Coral rather than mauve
Score details
Shade match
56
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
58
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 8% ingredient overlap
Differences: Noticeably different swatch colour · Neutral rather than cool undertone · Coral rather than mauve · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%46Combination, Dry, Normal, OilyNormal, Combination, SensitiveSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, normal skin
Overall match 78/100Shade match 92/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.