Fit Me Blush 30 Rose dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (43,306)·Rose · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims hydration
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity)· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
92
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 7% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Long-wearing rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Differences: Deeper· Neutral rather than warm undertone· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
74
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Close colour · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Neutral rather than warm undertone · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
88
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Very close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
87
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Near-identical swatch colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Pink rather than rose· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
93
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Looks identical · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Pink rather than rose · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)· Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%40Not listedClaimedSome differenceThe match claims hydration; your product does not list it
Skin types40%46Combination, Dry, Normal, OilyNormal, Combination, SensitiveSome differenceBoth marketed for combination, normal skin
Overall match 79/100Shade match 95/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
Stila Convertible Color Lip & Cheek Cream Blush in Patina, against Maybelline Fit Me Blush in 30 Rose. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade30 RoseClosest overall alternativePatinaHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall94
Colour55%90#ef9893#f09191Very close colourColour difference 2.3 (0 is identical)
Depth15%97LightLightSameDepth difference 2.1 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100RoseRoseSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared88
Finish50%100NaturalNaturalSameSame natural finish
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%—not comparableNot listedCreamNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · none of 3 comparable50
Longevity50%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists long wear
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Overall match 84/100Shade match 94/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
Ulta Beauty
SephoraCosts $30.01 more
