Fit Me Blush 25 Pink dupes and alternatives Maybelline
4.2 (43,306)·Pink · Warm · Light
Closest shade match is the equivalent shade, scored on colour, depth, undertone and colour family only. Closest overall alternative is the most similar blush overall: shade match 55%, finish, pigmentation and format 25%, wear and performance 15%, comfort and skin suitability 5%.
Overall alternativesShade matchesRanked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Ranked by the overall match: the most similar blush on shade, finish, wear and comfort and skin suitability together. Each row leads with its overall match; the shade match is beneath it.
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)· Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Score details
Shade match
83
Finish, pigmentation & format
77
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Close colour · Natural · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 1% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Dry, Combination, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Claims transfer resistance
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
96
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
95
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: peachy pink with golden shimmer
Differences: Deeper· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
66
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
96
Close colour · Dewy · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 15% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Peach rather than pink· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
88
Very close colour · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Peach rather than pink · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 16-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
81
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Satin · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone· Shimmer rather than natural (finish)· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
86
Finish, pigmentation & format
53
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Shimmer · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Neutral rather than warm undertone · Shimmer rather than natural (finish) · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 12-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Retailer shade note: A nude pink with golden shimmer
Matches: Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort· Claims hydration
Differences: Mauve rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Mauve rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Claims waterproof· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation)· 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity)
Score details
Shade match
79
Finish, pigmentation & format
74
Wear & performance
40
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Matte · Buildable
Ingredients (not scored): 5% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Buildable rather than opaque (pigmentation) · 24-hour wear rather than not listed (longevity) · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Oily rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Very close colour· Same warm undertone· Both claim comfort
Differences: Coral rather than pink· Dewy rather than natural (finish)· Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation)
Score details
Shade match
82
Finish, pigmentation & format
55
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
78
Very close colour · Dewy · Sheer
Ingredients (not scored): 3% ingredient overlap
Differences: Coral rather than pink · Dewy rather than natural (finish) · Sheer rather than opaque (pigmentation) · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Matches: Same warm undertone· Same finish: natural· Claims hydration
Differences: Deeper· Peach rather than pink· Does not claim comfort
Score details
Shade match
62
Finish, pigmentation & format
100
Wear & performance
50
Comfort & skin suitability
54
Slight colour difference · Natural
Ingredients (not scored): 0% ingredient overlap
Differences: Deeper · Peach rather than pink · Does not claim comfort · Normal, Dry, Combination rather than combination, dry, normal, oily (skin types)
Benefit Cosmetics Dandelion Baby-Pink Brightening Blush in Full Size, against Maybelline Fit Me Blush in 25 Pink. Every attribute compared, with its share of the score.
ComparedYour shade25 PinkClosest matchFull SizeHow they compareScore
Shade match55% of overall98
Colour55%96#f3b2af#f3b1abLooks identicalColour difference 1.2 (0 is identical)
Depth15%99LightLightSameDepth difference 0.4 on the 0–100 scale
Undertone15%100WarmWarmSameSame product undertone
Colour family15%100PinkPinkSameSame colour family
Finish, pigmentation & format25% of overall · 2 of 3 compared81
Finish50%89NaturalSatinCloseSatin finish rather than natural
Pigmentation25%65OpaqueBuildableSome differenceBuildable rather than opaque
Format25%—not comparableNot listedPowderNot listed for eitherFormat not listed for one product
Wear & performance15% of overall · 1 of 3 compared40
Longevity50%40Not listed8-hour wearSome differenceThe match claims long wear; your product does not list it
Transfer resistance30%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists transfer resistance
Comfort & skin suitability5% of overall · 1 of 3 compared100
Comfort40%100ClaimedClaimedSameBoth products claim a comfortable feel
Hydration20%—not comparableNot listedNot listedNot listed for eitherNeither product lists hydration
Skin types40%—not comparableCombination, Dry, Normal, OilyNot listedNot listed for eitherSkin types not listed for one product
Overall match 85/100Shade match 98/100Medium confidence· Digital match
Weights are each part's share of the overall match and each attribute's share of its part; an attribute neither product lists is not comparable and its weight goes to the others in its part. Confidence reflects data quality, not similarity. Price and ingredients are not part of either score.
30 similar shades scored two ways: the shade match on colour, depth, undertone and colour family; the overall match on shade match, finish, pigmentation and format, wear and performance and comfort and suitability. A pair with no swatch colour on one side or Low data confidence is listed without a score. Ingredients are shown for information and used by the filters only. Prices are shown next to every match and never change a score. How scoring and confidence work.
Shade colours are sampled from Beautler’s processing of retailer swatch images and are a digital approximation. Prices and stock were last checked when the product was imported; the retailer page is the source of truth.
SephoraCosts $15.01 more
Ulta Beauty
